Da 2166 9 1 Template

When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, consider the following key takeaways:

• Accurate Information is Essential: Ensure that all personal and administrative data is filled out correctly, including name, SSN, rank, and unit information.
• Understand Submission Reasons: Clearly state the reason for submission in the designated section to avoid confusion.
• Follow the Correct Format: Use the specified format for dates (YYYYMMDD) throughout the form to maintain consistency.
• Rater and Senior Rater Information: Complete the sections for the rater and senior rater accurately, including their signatures and email addresses.
• Performance Evaluation is Critical: Provide thorough evaluations in the performance section. Address each area with specific comments regarding the rated NCO's performance.
• Counseling Dates Matter: Record all counseling dates accurately to reflect the support and guidance provided to the rated NCO.
• Review Process: Be aware of the review process. The supplementary reviewer’s comments can provide additional insights into the evaluation.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO's signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but confirms the accuracy of the administrative data.
• Know the Appeals Process: Familiarize yourself with the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3 in case of disagreements with the evaluation.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. Several other forms and documents are often utilized in conjunction with this evaluation report to ensure a comprehensive assessment of performance and potential. Below is a list of these related documents.

• DA Form 4856: This is a Developmental Counseling Form used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It captures the soldier's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report used for higher-ranking NCOs. It provides a standardized format for evaluating performance and potential, similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1 but for different ranks.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is crucial for documenting physical readiness and performance standards.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used to measure body fat for soldiers who do not meet Army weight standards. They provide an assessment of physical fitness and adherence to Army regulations.
• DA Form 1059: This form is used to document academic achievements and completion of military training courses. It highlights additional qualifications and skills acquired by the soldier.
• DA Form 201: The Individual Medical Readiness Record tracks a soldier's medical readiness, including immunizations and physical examinations. This form ensures that soldiers meet health standards for deployment.
• Missouri Operating Agreement form: This document is essential for outlining the operational structure of an LLC in Missouri, ensuring clarity among members. For more information, you can visit https://missouriform.com/.
• DA Form 4187: This form is used for personnel actions, such as requests for reassignments or changes in duty status. It plays a role in documenting changes that may affect evaluations.
• DA Form 2-1: The Personnel Qualification Record provides a comprehensive overview of a soldier's qualifications, assignments, and training history. It is often referenced during evaluations.

These documents collectively support the evaluation process, ensuring that all aspects of a soldier's performance and readiness are considered. Utilizing these forms helps maintain a standardized approach to personnel assessments within the Army.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, keep these tips in mind:

• Double-check your information. Ensure that names, SSNs, and other details are accurate.
• Use official email addresses. Always provide a .gov or .mil email for all parties involved.
• Complete all sections. Make sure each part of the form is filled out to avoid delays.
• Sign where required. Ensure that all signatures are obtained before submission.

Also, avoid these common mistakes:

• Do not leave any fields blank. Incomplete forms can lead to processing issues.
• Avoid using unofficial email addresses. This can cause communication problems.
• Do not rush through the process. Take your time to ensure accuracy.
• Never submit without reviewing the entire form. A final check can catch errors.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a daunting task, and many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to delays or complications in the evaluation process. One frequent error is failing to provide complete and accurate personal information in Part I. This includes the name, Social Security Number, and rank. Omitting any of this information can cause significant issues, as the form may be considered incomplete.

Another mistake often seen is incorrect dates in the "Period Covered" section. It is crucial to ensure that the start and end dates accurately reflect the evaluation period. Inaccurate dates can lead to confusion and may affect the validity of the evaluation. Additionally, some individuals forget to include the reason for submission. This is a vital piece of information that helps clarify the context of the evaluation.

Many people also overlook the importance of the Rater’s and Senior Rater’s signatures. Without these signatures, the form cannot be processed. Ensure that all parties involved sign and date the form in the appropriate sections. Failing to do so can result in delays and may necessitate a resubmission of the form.

Another common pitfall is neglecting to verify the email addresses provided. The form requires .gov or .mil email addresses, and any errors here can hinder communication regarding the evaluation. Double-checking these details can save time and prevent unnecessary follow-ups.

In Part III, some individuals may provide vague or incomplete descriptions of daily duties and responsibilities. It is essential to be specific and thorough, as this section significantly impacts the overall evaluation. Describing duties in detail helps provide a clearer picture of the rated NCO's contributions and capabilities.

Furthermore, many fail to address the required comments in the performance evaluation sections. Simply checking a box without elaborating can undermine the evaluation's effectiveness. Providing specific examples and observations strengthens the assessment and offers valuable insights into the rated NCO's performance.

Another mistake is not following the guidelines for the APFT and height/weight entries. If an NCO has failed the APFT or does not meet height and weight standards, comments are mandatory. Ignoring this requirement can raise questions about the accuracy of the evaluation.

Lastly, individuals sometimes forget to include enclosures or attachments that are relevant to the evaluation. This could include previous performance evaluations or other supporting documents. Omitting these can lead to a lack of context for the current evaluation, potentially affecting the overall assessment.

In conclusion, taking the time to carefully review and complete the DA 2166-9-1 form can significantly impact the evaluation process. By avoiding these common mistakes, individuals can ensure that their evaluations are accurate, complete, and reflective of their true performance.